If he was fighting in 1914, he really should have been 16/17 at that point, although he was treated very much as a fag. (Being beaten by another pupil, rather than a master, etc.)
Then again, I can't remember if they gave a date for the battle scene. It certainly looked far more 1917 than 1914 but I think expecting anything approaching historical accuracy from Who is a foolish endeavour.
no subject
Then again, I can't remember if they gave a date for the battle scene. It certainly looked far more 1917 than 1914 but I think expecting anything approaching historical accuracy from Who is a foolish endeavour.