errrrr

Jan. 4th, 2008 12:52 am
burntcopper: (being repressed)
[personal profile] burntcopper
[livejournal.com profile] munchkinott, tell me you managed to watch the repeat of the George Gently ep. I didn't manage to get my allotted gay Armitage greaser on a motorcycle who ends up getting tied up and tortured quotient for this evening and I need to vicariously live through someone else's drooling. :mutter:

The [livejournal.com profile] robinhoodbbc lot are scaring me again. I'm pretty sure that in other fandoms, the mod is expected to be reasonable and give actual reasons for new rules and so on. I don't go on general show comms much anymore (the few I am, such as for chuck, the fandom is tiny, the mod is almost entirely silent (ah, the halcyon days of a tiny fandom taking baby steps)), but I'm still pretty sure this is not the reaction of a sane/unbrainwashed comm :

:mod has hissy fit and posts up a new rule in response to someone making a post she doesn't like (in this case, fic requests):
newbie : 'um, is there a reason for this rule? Slightly confused, just want clarification.'
someone else : 'Because the Sheriff says so. :)'

... the response? was a quote, Including the smiley face. They did add a bit of 'I think this is why :insert vaguely logical reason:', but I'm sure that in other fandom comms, they're not in the 'we're quite happy to accept that the mod doesn't normally give a reason beyond 'it pisses me off. the end.' camp. They don't actually expect a reasoned answer. I think I may have created a monster.

In other robin hood fandom news, due to the fandom pretty much exploding due to the season finale over the past week, I passed the compilers of the fandom newsletter the metaphorical vodka I'd been slugging all week to try to cope. ...I've never seen someone do the 'I don't normally drink but you're not getting this back' that fast.

Date: 2008-01-04 03:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] munchkinott.livejournal.com
Did I? Dude, I have that programme committed to memory in a way that enables me to watch NCIS and switch over at the exact time of:

1) The cheek peck.
2) The sledgehammer handle thumbing acshun.
3) The unintentionally adorable sight of Ricky chained up and about to be blowtorched by Prince John. (Thus I have arrived at the conclusion it doesn't matter what way directors and designers insist Teh Armitage be tied or chained up, he looks apologetic about it from every angle. ^.^)

*polishes nails* I do believe I have got that show sussed. *beams*

my allotted gay Armitage greaser on a motorcycle who ends up getting tied up and tortured quotient

It's just 'Robin Hood: 1960', isn't it? Though with more inspirational fanart.

You're not just a dictator. You're an evil mastermind and people recognise that is not a force you mess with. ^_^

I'm still on comm catch-up. Tbh, I haven't got as far as the squeepost yet, but I do feel that if I opened me gob outside of the Munchkin Enclave it'd be the equivalent of tossing a lit match on a stack of leaky aviation fuel barrels. So I won't. And I'm not. But I do get the feeling that the Beeb are aching to turn this into a National Scandal of Deirdre Incarceration proportions. *eyeroll*

Not working, because the way is now clear for Guy to marry Allan! :-D Djaq could organise the stag n' hen night; John n' Will'd make lovely bridesmaids; Robin could officiate; Vaysey'd be Best Man ("Kiss my ring!") and Much could catch the bouquet. :-D SORTED! ^.^ The last paragraph of this post was brought to you in connection with Bacofoil and Nescafe.

Profile

burntcopper: (Default)
burntcopper

April 2014

S M T W T F S
  12345
678910 1112
1314 1516171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 5th, 2026 02:09 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios