stuff

Mar. 24th, 2009 12:37 pm
burntcopper: (friends basestar)
Sitting in main draft. which will not change until they've finished the other end of the office. FREEZING.

Playing with last.fm, since though I can access iplayer at new office, it's stuck on 'connecting'. Which will be an utter arse when i want to re-listen to radio 4. Fortunately, in a lull period when it comes to Just a Minute and the News Quiz. ...Though for the other users of last.fm, does it regularly do the thing where you pick an artist, pick _insert artist here_ radio, but it takes a good 10-12 songs for it to get to a track by that artist? Oh, and the bass appears to be missing.

Still no work email - personal, yes, work, no. Customer services rang up to ask what our new one was and I informed them we didn't have it yet. They asked if we could tell them when we do. I think we're not going to tell them that we have it until doomsday...

Not sure I like this chair. shoulders aching a bit.

Watched finale of BSG. which comes under 'uh. wha? um. uh. gah! But I had friends on that basestar!' Good, equal amounts of no fucking idea *what* happened there, tied up everything, nice job on using weird-arse flashbacks from much earlier in series, and oh, coda, nice job on freaking us out. Roll on Caprica.

Random arse survey : tell me your current mobile ringtone. No matter how embarassing. Mine's the Farscape S2 theme.
burntcopper: (hungover paul)
oh dear god. Okay, pictures in a case report. No consent. no consent for even the reporting of the case, let alone the images. Eyes are blacked out, but there's a tattoo on one body part.

....And the author says 'oh, the eyes are blacked out, what's a tattoo here or there?'

Excuse me while I shove their face in the concept that tattoos are used to identify dead bodies and are far more likely to stick in someone's mind than someone's face - which can change due to the light/health/etc.

Dear FSM, we need consent for any case-specific images that show flesh, never mind if identifying marks appear or not.

And editorial and pre-accept have been getting really fucking snotty recently when we report errors that they forgot about. Dear previous depts, all of this should be settled before it gets to us. It is not our bloody job to be the guardians at the gate or making sure that articles have tables/figures/chunks of articles. (of course, being the last port of call, we're the ones that get it in the neck if these are published without said items)
burntcopper: (flying toaster)
Well, after one of the IT guys managed to crash my computer remotely (there is a reason our dept bans them from our computers - we see that little messenger box pop up and we fear) I stormed in, grabbed him and said 'you will come and fix what you did *now*', he got the answer to the question he'd originally wanted (he wanted to install version 6 of something and we were replying with 'er, did that last week' - so checking that it was + serial number), and he went through the deepest darkest parts of the registry to find any start-up stuff to see what was getting my computer to a crawl in the past week. And you know what we found? ITUNES. on the start-up. WTF? I distinctly remember opting out of it the last time I attempted to put a quicktime update through. BAD APPLE.

Yesterday I started writing at lunchtime and continued writing on the way home. Bit of random thinking inbetween writing periods, but otherwise complete stream of consciousness prose, no crossings-out fic. Which was 7 pages of A4 Peter/Susan/Bacchus porn. :facepalm: I have no idea why either. Quite decent porn, too, where Bacchus essentially snorts at Peter and Susan's reluctance to get it on at a revel because of the little thing called siblinghood. Never mind that I ship Peter/Susan *anyway*, but I did always wonder how they got together in my head the first time round. And apparently it involves wine and Bacchus going 'don't be fucking stupid'.

Other news. Continuing the Thin Veneer of Civility 'verse (post-war Pevensies) which is essentially their parents freaking out, and need to finish the scene I'm currently on, which is Peter home on leave. And the parents seeing yet another side to them - Lucy's bossiness and insistence on checking out Peter for injuries because she doesn't trust him or the army medics is bloody weird, because yes, she wants to be a nurse, but she hasn't even left school yet, for instance. And no, Susan is not that alienated from the others as CS Lewis had it. She's being practical and making the best of things. And may be getting recruited into government or spy work at some point in the future.
burntcopper: (weighed)
This afternoon work went to hell in a handbasket. From computer and programs periodically siezing up to getting interrupted every five minutes to the point that it would take me several minutes to figure out what I *had* been doing. Still, nothing compared to Lissy - first day back from holiday, morning was fine and happy for all that it was catching up with masses of work, and then came the afternoon. Where she discovered that the bloke who'd been supposed to be doing work had left it riddled with errors (which meant it wouldn't upload), can't contact him as he's in hospital, her sector of the workflow well and truly and buggered up, and workflow themselves somehow did something that screwed up completely. I was solving every one else's work quickly and calmly. whenever it was mine, the computer went 'screw you'.

Came home, watered plants, put food away, and dived into comm management. Headache averted.

Doing the blinky of realisation that if it wasn't for ruling half the comms, I would be a near-silent Robin Hood fan. Looking at the occasional icon post. Never reading the fic. commenting on the ep reaction posts but that's it.

sitting on my hands and biting my tongue over the [livejournal.com profile] thedarkisrising comm. I hate the layout. I hate the white text on dark. I hate the mood theme. Ages ago I asked the mod if I could go through and tag everything. She said yes, so I did. Then discovered when a spammer hit that I could delete posts. It's a low-traffic, very well-behaved community so the most I ever do is tag things. Looked at my privileges - and it turns out she gave me maintainer. Which freaked me out slightly. Essentially I can do *anything* to that comm. I am not allowed to do anything to it, it's not my comm, it's not my comm, the owner is still a member even if she's completely absent. I presume a lot of you heard about that thing over in SPN where a mod got banned from her own community by two people who decided they could run it better. I just want to go in and change the layout. NOT ALLOWED.

SMITE

Jul. 30th, 2008 01:10 pm
burntcopper: (Default)
work is at that stage where I'm about to hit someone. And am contemplating presenting HR with my next dental bill due to ongoing teeth-grinding and jaw clenching. Also any related nurofen bills.

and now I've got that 'we were going to go see dark knight tonight only everyone's dropped out and what about this weekend?' I don't bloody *live* in London.

no, really. cannot cope. off to mordor.
burntcopper: (will kill you)
workflow support at our place took workflow down so we couldn't do any work for 40 mins. this is something we're resigned to as they have a habit of breaking it. We scream, they try to look innocent.

HSBC : completely fucking fails.

I go to make my credit card payments for this month. When I hit pay, it logs me out. So I phone tech support to inform that they have a problem. Get passed onto tech support. Who asks me the usual 'which browser, which OS'.
Me : Firefox and Windows XP.
Them : Could you try IE?
Me : I refuse to use IE, it crashes my computer.
Them : Um.... okay, I think it's the settings and can you wipe your cookies and cache and de-click the pop-up blocker?
Me : I log onto this site every week from this computer, and it usually works. Why isn't it working now? It was fine last week with these exact settings.'
Them : mumblemumble can you just go in and play round with the options?
Me : FINE. (goes in, de-checks various settings and makes payment, then goes and re-checks them). Now go and fix your damn coding. Your inability to be compatible with a common browser is not my fault.

Vaguely depressed. Looked at the National Theatre's jobs page. It turns out that the role of box office assistant pays more than my current job. ...comforting. Went and applied for the admin assistant to the director's office at the NPG which pays more and requires less tech skills than this one. But you know where pays even less? Ambassador's Theatre Group. Who wanted a whole bunch of experience on top of that.

stuff

Jun. 3rd, 2008 01:09 pm
burntcopper: (adipose)
Tired. Hot. Brain feels like swiss cheese due to job. (tedious, tiring, annoying, brain-deadening, stressful, brain is not engaged whatsoever, pissed off with the general shite) Looking for new jobs. Problem being that I'm not qualified for very much and tend to run screaming from most office type stuff. Can't afford to take time off for re-training, anything vaguely interesting tends to pay less than my current job - and I'm just about surviving on this wage, have no idea what I actually want and was ready to kill something at the end of the last time I was in education. Add to that the problem of London makes me ill but all my friends and social interests are in London. Yeah. I'm fucked.

Jodie won the Nancy competition (squee and bitching and discussion over at [livejournal.com profile] nancy_or_oliver, Cameron and ALW really need to remember that people have opinions about Oliver!, and if you wanted someone really different that you could mould for a role, you should be re-doing the entire production, not leaving it to the public to decide. and the public really resent being told who to vote for when the person you're pushing has shown time and again that she can't act, is really awkward on stage, can't dance and is horribly inconsistent. Especially when one of the other contestants is sweet, warm, funny, can act, has great stage presence, a great voice, and generally conforms to people's idea of the role (plus the two judges who are actually being honest and thinking in terms of who the public would like plus who'd they like to act against really like - and yes, it was gleesome to see JB and Denise's little victory dance). Oh, and then you called her fat in the semis.

Oi, [livejournal.com profile] wiccachik, was poking around some theatre sites and it looks like the Bournemeister is doing a new production at Sadlers. Dorian Grey, 2nd -14th Sept (premieres at Edinburgh festival on Aug 22nd for anyone up that way, she says, giving Celia a pointed look). However, the only Bourne production listed at New Wimbledon is Edward Scissorhands for November. And no listing of whether Brick Shithouse is in it. :mutter mutter mutter:

Spent sunday afternoon at Stonor (family known for being around since Norman times - the original house dates from the 12th century, and then being really, really rich until they got fined like crazy for having an addiction to harbouring catholic priests during the Reformation), which is pretty, great for history geeks, has really gorgeous gardens (somewhat amused and calculating how much money they were making from the VW rally going on in a field at the front - £7 entry for rally *and* house, and we're pretty sure we saw some pre-war VW vans as we were driving out). Chatted to the volunteer tour people that lurked in the various rooms, talked to one bloke, turned a corner, then brain did the blinky blinky as the hairstyle was somewhat distinctive and realised that that tour person was Lord Camoys. (family photos on the tables in some of the rooms)

off to buy toothpaste.
burntcopper: (weighed)
Right, we publish medical journals. And often these have photos. Which by law you have to obtain written and informed consent from the patient or patient's guardian to publish, especially if the subject of the photo is even slightly identifiable. The only time you don't have to is if the patient is dead and/or their guardians are too.

It appears most of editorial and production do not know that this is law. And that as publishers we're the ones liable and can get sued if consent is not obtained. And did not understand why I started raising bloody hell over an article that had pictures of children in it (fortunately the faces were obscured) which of course goes double, with added furious emails to production that we were not letting any articles through that did not comply.

Cue me somewhat frantically trying to explain this to my boss and the deputy publisher. Cue them looking puzzled. Cue me trying to explain in a very quick version the law relating to models (ie, the subject of the photo) and the concept of model release forms and the fact that the only images that are exempt from this are journalistic ones. Emphasising the concept of 'they can sue us'.

...How can I be the only one who knows this? They're the publishers. And the only bloody reason *I* know this is the photography degree.

And then had people telling me 'you're rather frantic about this, calm down' - which of course brings out the backlash of 'do not fucking well tell me to calm down, I will calm down when this is fixed!'

:headdesk:

Profile

burntcopper: (Default)
burntcopper

April 2014

S M T W T F S
  12345
678910 1112
1314 1516171819
20212223242526
27282930   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 25th, 2025 07:13 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios